Nature’s right to damages in the event of civil liability?

Date

2025-06-05

Embargo

Advisor

Coadvisor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Inter-Research Science Publisher
Language
English

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Treating nature as a subject of law is a topic of contention in the contemporary era. A significant number of states, if not the majority, continue to refrain from recognising the protection of nature in this sense. This is because the essence of legal personality is attributed solely to individual or collective persons. However, some countries have already begun to approach environmental protection from the perspective of nature without being exclusively focused on human rights. This study is based on civil liability law in Portugal and seeks to verify the relevance of attributing legal personhood to nature. The research results indicate that the configuration of this instrument, which recognises the subjective rights of nature, could help improve environmental protection. However, it is not, in legal terms, the most appropriate way forward. From a human and non-human relational perspective, attributing a ‘status’ to nature may be preferable through existential heritage.

Keywords

Personhood, Common resources, Existencial heritage, Ecological damage, Civil liability

Document Type

Journal article

Citation

Martinez de Campos, M. (2025). Nature’s right to damages in the event of civil liability? Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 25, 51-70. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00220. Repositório Institucional UPT. https://hdl.handle.net/11328/6377

Identifiers

TID

Designation

Access Type

Open Access

Sponsorship

Description