Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.
Date
2011-12-01
Embargo
Advisor
Coadvisor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidade do Minho
Language
English
Alternative Title
Abstract
This article provides highlights of the evolution of the health care rationing debate
towards a more transparent and open approach involving public participation.
Discretionary models that have dominated health sector decision-making are being
questioned by different sectors of society. Using data from 442 college students, we
explore public’s views on its involvement in health care rationing decisions. Findings
suggest that although citizens wish to be consulted, they believe doctors should play the
most important role on the rationing decisions. Nonetheless, the confidence in doctors is
not independent of the criteria used to support their decisions.
Keywords
Priorities setting, Public involvement, Explicit rationing, Health-care
Document Type
Working paper
Publisher Version
Dataset
Citation
Pinho, M., Botelho, A., & Veiga, P. (2011). Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey, Working Paper Series, 43, 1-19. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada da Universidade do Minho. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277
Identifiers
TID
Designation
Access Type
Open Access