Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.

Date

2011-12-01

Embargo

Advisor

Coadvisor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Universidade do Minho
Language
English

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

This article provides highlights of the evolution of the health care rationing debate towards a more transparent and open approach involving public participation. Discretionary models that have dominated health sector decision-making are being questioned by different sectors of society. Using data from 442 college students, we explore public’s views on its involvement in health care rationing decisions. Findings suggest that although citizens wish to be consulted, they believe doctors should play the most important role on the rationing decisions. Nonetheless, the confidence in doctors is not independent of the criteria used to support their decisions.

Keywords

Priorities setting, Public involvement, Explicit rationing, Health-care

Document Type

Working paper

Publisher Version

Dataset

Citation

Pinho, M., Botelho, A., & Veiga, P. (2011). Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey, Working Paper Series, 43, 1-19. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada da Universidade do Minho. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277

TID

Designation

Access Type

Open Access

Sponsorship

Description