Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal
Date
2017-05
Embargo
Advisor
Coadvisor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Oxford Academic
Language
English
Alternative Title
Abstract
The main aim of this paper is to investigate the views of healthcare professionals in Portugal about healthcare rationing, and compare them with the views of college students. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 60 healthcare professionals and 180 college students. Respondents faced a hypothetical rationing dilemma where they had to order four patients (differentiated by personal characteristics and health conditions) and justify their choices. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to test for differences in orderings, and content analysis to categorize the written justifications. The findings suggest that both groups appeared to support three main rationing principles: (i) health maximization, (ii) priority to the severely ill and (iii) priority to the young. However, professionals seemed to give less weight to the latter principle. In conclusion, professionals have similar views to students about healthcare rationing, though may be slightly less inclined to give priority to the young.
Keywords
Document Type
Journal article
Publisher Version
10.1093/phe/phx005
Dataset
Citation
Pinho, M., Borges, A. P., & Cookson, R. (2017). Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal. Public Health Ethics, 11(1), 90-102. doi: 10.1093/phe/phx005. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1853
Identifiers
TID
Designation
Access Type
Open Access