Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal

Date

2017-05

Embargo

Advisor

Coadvisor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford Academic
Language
English

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to investigate the views of healthcare professionals in Portugal about healthcare rationing, and compare them with the views of college students. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 60 healthcare professionals and 180 college students. Respondents faced a hypothetical rationing dilemma where they had to order four patients (differentiated by personal characteristics and health conditions) and justify their choices. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to test for differences in orderings, and content analysis to categorize the written justifications. The findings suggest that both groups appeared to support three main rationing principles: (i) health maximization, (ii) priority to the severely ill and (iii) priority to the young. However, professionals seemed to give less weight to the latter principle. In conclusion, professionals have similar views to students about healthcare rationing, though may be slightly less inclined to give priority to the young.

Keywords

Document Type

Journal article

Publisher Version

10.1093/phe/phx005

Dataset

Citation

Pinho, M., Borges, A. P., & Cookson, R. (2017). Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal. Public Health Ethics, 11(1), 90-102. doi: 10.1093/phe/phx005. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1853

TID

Designation

Access Type

Open Access

Sponsorship

Description