Evaluating the acceptance of CBDCs: Experimental research with artificial intelligence (AI) generated synthetic response

dc.contributor.authorNáñez Alonso, Sergio Luis
dc.contributor.authorOzili, Peterson K.
dc.contributor.authorSastre Hernández , Beatriz María
dc.contributor.authorPacheco, Luís Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-01T10:36:30Z
dc.date.available2025-04-01T10:36:30Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-31
dc.description.abstractThis research examines the factors that influence the public's expectation for more information, acceptance or rejection of central bank digital currencies (CBDC). Using generative AI (ChatGPT 4.0), responses were simulated to mimic CBDC adoption scenarios, considering demographic attributes, such as gender, income, education, age, level of financial literacy, network effect, media influence, and merchant acceptance. A total of 663 synthetic responses were generated and analyzed using statistical methods and multinomial logistic regression to assess the probability of acceptance, rejection, or waiting for more information to decide. The chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) model showed a high performance in correctly classifying cases of acceptance, indecision, and rejection, presenting an accuracy of 92.6%. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that factors, such as educational level, financial experience, and income level, significantly influence the decision to accept a CBDC. This method also shows a high performance, as it obtained an accuracy of 96.4%. These results are in line with previous research and underline the effectiveness of generative AI as a reproducible and low-cost tool for analyzing hypothetical scenarios. Generative AI, with its algorithmic fidelity, has great potential for predicting human behavior in economic contexts. However, synthetic data may not capture the complexities and nuances of actual human decision making. As a result, certain contextual factors, emotional influences, and unique personal experiences that may significantly influence an individual's decision to accept or reject CBDC may be overlooked.
dc.identifier.citationNáñez Alonso, S. L., Ozili, P. K., Sastre Hernández, B. M., & Pacheco, L. M. (2025). Evaluating the acceptance of CBDCs: Experimental research with artificial intelligence (AI) generated synthetic response. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 9(1), 242-273. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2025008. Repositório Institucional UPT. https://hdl.handle.net/11328/6235
dc.identifier.issn2573-0134
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11328/6235
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAIMS Press
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2025008
dc.rightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCBDC adoption
dc.subjectLarge Language Models
dc.subjectAI Generative
dc.subjectsurvey experiment
dc.subjectsynthetic responses
dc.subjectbehavioral finance
dc.subjectdigital finance
dc.subject.fosCiências Sociais - Economia e Gestão
dc.titleEvaluating the acceptance of CBDCs: Experimental research with artificial intelligence (AI) generated synthetic response
dc.typejournal article
dcterms.referenceshttps://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/QFE.2025008
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage273
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage242
oaire.citation.titleQuantitative Finance and Economics
oaire.citation.volume9
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
person.familyNamePacheco
person.givenNameLuís Miguel
person.identifier.ciencia-idBF16-0EF2-107B
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9066-6441
person.identifier.ridE-5193-2010
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55945343700
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa25aba90-4787-45a8-b908-646f24b32dfc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya25aba90-4787-45a8-b908-646f24b32dfc

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.3934_QFE.2025008.pdf
Size:
1.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format