Gender and risk aversion: Evidence from a natural experiment

Date

2023-06-14

Embargo

Advisor

Coadvisor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Language
English

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

The theoretical literature on risk aversion and Expected Utility Theory is extensive; however, the analysis of this behaviour with natural experiments could be more comprehensive. In this paper, we use data from 120 episodes of the Portuguese version of the TV game show The Price is Right, namely from The Wheel game, to explore risk aversion as well as the impact of gender in decision-making. The Wheel game has straightforward rules and huge expected payoffs. All contestants have access to the same information and distributions of uncertainty, making it a unique field laboratory to conduct an experimental test of rational decision theory. The objective is to infer the risk aversion levels of decision-makers from their choice to turn the wheel and the influence of gender on risk attitudes. There is a widespread view that women are more risk-averse than men. However, we could not reject the hypothesis that women and men have the same level of risk aversion. Nevertheless, we have evidence that contestants are more risk-averse than risk-seeking. The omission bias, loss aversion and regret can explain that behaviour.

Keywords

Risk aversion, Gender, Decision-making, Rationality, TV show, The Price is Right

Document Type

Journal article

Dataset

Citation

Pacheco, L. M., Lobão, J., & Coelho, S. (2023). Gender and risk aversion: Evidence from a natural experiment. Games, 14(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/g14030049. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4847

TID

Designation

Access Type

Open Access

Sponsorship

Description